HomePLAB 1Ethics & Law (GMC Guidelines)

Master Ethics & Law (GMC Guidelines)
for PLAB 1

Access 50+ high-yield questions tailored for the 2026 syllabus. Includes AI-powered explanations and performance tracking.

Start Free Practice View Full Syllabus
HIGH YIELD NOTES ~5 min read

Core Concepts

  • Four Pillars of Medical Ethics (Beauchamp and Childress):
    • Autonomy: Patient's right to make their own informed decisions. Requires capacity.
    • Beneficence: Acting in the patient's best interest.
    • Non-maleficence: Do no harm.
    • Justice: Fair and equitable distribution of healthcare resources.
  • Confidentiality: Duty to protect patient information.
    • Exceptions: Patient consent, public interest (e.g., unfit driver, serious crime), court order, statutory requirement.
  • Consent (VIC): Must be Voluntary, Informed, and given by a person with Capacity.
    • Types: Implied (e.g., offering arm for BP), Expressed (verbal), Written (surgery).
    • Children:
      • Gillick Competence (Under 16): Can consent if they understand the proposed treatment/implications, even without parental consent. Doctors must assess.
      • Fraser Guidelines (Contraception for Under 16): Specific guidance for contraception without parental knowledge if Gillick competent and certain criteria met.
    • Advance Decisions to Refuse Treatment (ADRTs): Legally binding if valid (written, signed, witnessed, applies to situation, patient had capacity when made).
    • Lasting Power of Attorney (LPA) for Health & Welfare: Appointed by patient to make decisions if they lose capacity.
  • Capacity (Mental Capacity Act 2005):
    • Two-Stage Test:
      1. Diagnostic: Does the person have an impairment of the mind or brain?
      2. Functional: Does this impairment mean they are unable to make a specific decision when needed? (Unable to understand information, retain information, weigh information, communicate decision).
    • Presumption of capacity. Decisions must be in patient's best interests if they lack capacity.
  • Duty of Candour (GMC): Openness and honesty when something goes wrong with patient care, including explaining what happened, potential effects, and offering an apology.
  • Raising Concerns (Whistleblowing): Professional duty to raise concerns about patient safety, colleague's conduct/performance (Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 protects whistleblowers).
  • Professionalism: Maintain boundaries, manage personal beliefs (cannot refuse treatment based on personal beliefs if it affects patient care), declare conflicts of interest.
  • Record Keeping: Clear, accurate, contemporaneous, legible, attributable.

Clinical Presentation

  • Patient refusing life-saving treatment (Autonomy, Capacity).
  • Family requesting patient's medical information (Confidentiality).
  • Concern about a colleague's substance misuse or poor practice (Raising Concerns).
  • Adolescent requesting contraception without parental knowledge (Gillick/Fraser).
  • Patient with fluctuating mental state requiring urgent decision (Capacity, Best Interests).
  • Patient making a complaint about care received (Duty of Candour, Professionalism).
  • Doctor asked to provide a report for court (Confidentiality, Record Keeping).
  • Dilemma over allocating scarce resources (Justice).
  • Managing an adverse event or medical error (Duty of Candour).

Diagnosis (Gold Standard)

Applying the ethical framework (Four Pillars) to the specific scenario. Performing a formal capacity assessment if doubt exists (MCA 2005). Identifying and referencing relevant GMC guidelines. Seeking advice from senior colleagues, ethics committees, or legal teams for complex cases. Documenting the entire decision-making process thoroughly.

Management (First Line)

  • Patient-centred Approach: Prioritise the patient's best interests and autonomy.
  • Communication: Engage in open, honest, and clear communication with the patient (or their LPA/next of kin if lacking capacity).
  • Documentation: Maintain meticulous, contemporaneous records of all discussions, decisions, assessments (especially capacity), and rationale.
  • GMC Guidelines: Always adhere to "Good Medical Practice" and specific GMC guidance relevant to the situation.
  • Escalation & Discussion: Discuss complex ethical dilemmas with senior colleagues, the multidisciplinary team, ethics committees, or legal services.
  • Reflection & Learning: Reflect on the situation and learn from outcomes, especially adverse events, in line with Duty of Candour.

Exam Red Flags

  • Sharing patient information without valid consent or justifiable public interest.
  • Overriding a capacitous patient's refusal of treatment.
  • Failing to adequately assess capacity when there is doubt, or assuming lack of capacity.
  • Prioritising personal beliefs (e.g., religious) over a patient's best interests or evidence-based care.
  • Failing to raise concerns about a colleague's fitness to practice or patient safety issues.
  • Not documenting important discussions, decisions, or rationales, especially regarding consent or capacity.
  • Failing to be open and honest after an adverse event (breaching Duty of Candour).
  • Breaching professional boundaries with a patient.

Sample Practice Questions

Question 1

A 30-year-old patient requests a prescription for a specific high-dose vitamin supplement, claiming it will 'boost immunity' based on information they read online. You review the evidence and find no clinical indication for its use in their case, and are concerned about potential side effects at the requested dose. What is your most appropriate response?

A) Prescribe the supplement as requested, as the patient has a right to choose their treatment.
B) Decline the request, explain your reasoning based on lack of evidence and potential harm, and explore the patient's underlying concerns.
C) Prescribe a lower, safer dose of the supplement to satisfy the patient, while still advising caution.
D) Refer the patient to a private doctor who might be more willing to prescribe the requested supplement.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.
Question 2

Dr. Sharma is treating a 34-year-old patient diagnosed with HIV. The patient's mother calls Dr. Sharma, expressing concern about her son's health and asking if there's anything serious she should know. The patient has explicitly stated he does not want his medical information shared with his family. What is Dr. Sharma's most appropriate initial action in this situation, according to GMC guidelines?

A) Inform the mother that due to patient confidentiality, he cannot disclose any information without the patient's explicit consent.
B) Briefly explain to the mother that her son is stable but cannot share further details.
C) Advise the patient to inform his mother himself about his condition.
D) Arrange a meeting with the patient and his mother to facilitate disclosure.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.
Question 3

A 72-year-old patient, Mrs. Davies, who Dr. Khan has been treating for chronic pain for several years, offers Dr. Khan an antique watch, stating, "You've been so kind and helpful, please accept this small token of my immense gratitude." The watch appears to be of significant monetary value. What is the most appropriate action for Dr. Khan according to GMC guidelines?

A) Politically decline the gift, explaining that GMC guidelines advise against accepting gifts of significant value.
B) Accept the gift, but declare it in the practice's gift register.
C) Accept the gift, as refusing might offend the patient and damage the therapeutic relationship.
D) Advise Mrs. Davies to donate the watch to a charity instead.
Explanation: This area is hidden for preview users.

Ready to see the answers?

Unlock All Answers

PLAB 1

  • ✓ 50+ Ethics & Law (GMC Guidelines) Questions
  • ✓ AI Tutor Assistance
  • ✓ Detailed Explanations
  • ✓ Performance Analytics
Get Full Access